USPTO serial 85520535
PENNY CHIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4735557Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 2015
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PENNY CHIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce Dizenfeld
BRUCE DIZENFELD THEODORA ORINGHER PC535 ANTON BLVD FL 9COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1947UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting to the fashion and retail industries in the field of business and market trends, business strategic planning, and planning and conducting fashion shows for commercial purposes; advertising and publicity services for the fashion industry, namely, promoting the goods, services, brand identity and commercial information and news of third parties through print, audio, video, digital, and on-line media; arranging personal appearances by an expert in the field of affordable fashion, personal beauty, and lifestyle, live or via the internet, television, radio, webcasts, satellite, mobile telephones, and computer devices; providing consumer product news and information via the internet; providing space at a website for the advertisement of the goods and services of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 12, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |