USPTO serial 85520614
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Newport Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rick Lin
RICK LIN SNELL & WILMER LLP600 ANTON BLVD STE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7689UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing a website in the field of job resources and listings for employers and job applicants comprised of employment opportunities information, career placement information and providing a database of resumes, job questionaire information and video resumes or video introductions uploaded by potential employees that are searchable and viewable by potential employers; providing online databases featuring information that ranks the employment qualifications of potential employees pursuant to guidelines defined for potential employers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |