USPTO serial 85520880
ISOLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISOLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
67063 Ludwigshafen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vijay Toke
Vijay Toke Hiaring Smith, LLP101 Lucas Valley RoadSuite 300San Rafael, CA 94903Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | metal-lined ceramic fibre insulation for components which conduct hot media, for use in the construction of automobiles, motors and engines, turbines and power units, heating and air-conditioning systems, machines and plants, and in the aeronautical industry; ceramic fibre insulation, lined with stainless steel foil and/or ceramic filament fabrics for components which conduct hot media, for use in the construction of automobiles, motors and engines, turbines and power units, heating and air-conditioning systems, machines and plants, and in the aeronautical industry; ceramic fibre insulation and microporous silica fibre insulation, all lined with titanium metal sheet/titanium foil and/or stainless steel sheet/foilfor components which conduct hot media, for use in the construction of automobiles, motors and engines, turbines and power units, heating and air-conditioning systems, machines and plants, and in the aeronautical industry; mineral fibre board insulation and ceramic high-temperature fibre insulation and microporous silicon dioxide fibre insulation, all lined with steel sheet and stainless steel foil for components which conduct hot media, for use in the construction of automobiles, motors and engines, turbines and power units, heating and air-conditioning systems, machines and plants, and in the aeronautical industry; fibreglass insulation in the shape of molded bowls with acoustic and thermal absorption and thermal reflection properties for components which conduct hot media, for use in the construction of automobiles, motors and engines, turbines and power units, heating and air-conditioning systems, machines and plants, and in the aeronautical industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |