USPTO serial 85521033
Serial No. 85521033
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 85521033?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise I. Mroz
DENISE I MROZ JOHNSON & JOHNSONSYNT 5182ONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLAZANEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 19380Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical implants made of titanium for use in craniofacial augmentation and reconstruction, namely, orbital plates | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | ISMR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |