USPTO serial 85521101
100% RECYCLED FIBER * GREATER ABSORPTION CAPACITY *
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5193632Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2017
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 100% RECYCLED FIBER * GREATER ABSORPTION CAPACITY *?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen Beacom Gorman
Maureen Beacom Gorman MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 South Wacker Drive6300 Willis TowerChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper hand-towels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CASCADES CANADA ULC
- Other trademarks owned by CASCADES CANADA ULC
- Other trademarks owned by CASCADES CANADA ULC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named 100% RECYCLED FIBER * GREATER ABSORPTION CAPACITY *
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 2, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 2, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |