USPTO serial 85521133
MY OTHER BAG...
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MY OTHER BAG...?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Manhattan Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Philpott
BRIAN J PHILPOTT KOPPEL PATRICK HEYBL & PHILPOTT2815 TOWNSGATE RDSTE 215WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | parodic canvas tote bags screen-printed with an artist's cartoonish rendering of a well-known designer handbag | ACTIVE | Nov 28, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |