Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85521630?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85521630. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PACK STATION WRAPPAK?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85521630, the listed owner(s) include: Ranpak Corp., Ranpak Corp..

What is USPTO serial number 85521630?

Serial number 85521630 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PACK STATION WRAPPAK. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PACK STATION WRAPPAK?

PACK STATION WRAPPAK (85521630) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover PACK STATION WRAPPAK?

The public record lists International Classes: 007, 016, 040. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85521630

PACK STATION WRAPPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jan 20, 2012
Status date: Nov 24, 2014
Registration date: —
Examiner: LOBO, DEBORAH E
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACK STATION WRAPPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Ranpak Corp.
Concord Township, OH
Other trademarks owned by Ranpak Corp.
Ranpak Corp.
Concord Township, OH
Other trademarks owned by Ranpak Corp.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher B. Jacobs

CHRISTOPHER B. JACOBS RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 EUCLID AVE FL 19CLEVELAND, OH 44115-2193UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Machines for manufacturing and dispensing dunnage material, particularly machines for converting paper into a relatively less dense packing material, and parts thereof	ACTIVE	—
016	Paper dunnage, namely, cushioning or padding made of crumpled paper for packing purposes	ACTIVE	—
040	Custom manufacture of machines for converting paper into a dunnage material and of packaging systems comprising the aforesaid machines	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 12, 2019	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
May 22, 2019	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Nov 24, 2014	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2014	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2014	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Aug 9, 2014	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Aug 8, 2014	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Aug 8, 2014	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Jul 11, 2014	NREV	NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED	—
Jul 11, 2014	TPEX	SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION	—
Jul 11, 2014	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jul 11, 2014	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 27, 2014	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2014	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2014	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Oct 22, 2013	NOAM	NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2013	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Aug 27, 2013	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2013	NONP	NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	—
Jul 24, 2013	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jul 23, 2013	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 2, 2013	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jun 7, 2013	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jun 7, 2013	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jun 7, 2013	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
May 16, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 16, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 16, 2013	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 29, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 29, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2012	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 26, 2012	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED	—
Jan 25, 2012	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Jan 24, 2012	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—