CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OBEY

USPTO serial 85521663

OBEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OBEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN B. GOLDMAN

NATALIE S RICHER LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK LLP600 SOUTH AVE WSTE 2WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care preparations, namely, hair shampoos, hair conditioners and hair straightening preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2014TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 28, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 28, 2014OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 29, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 8, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 1, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance