CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GRIPPER

USPTO serial 85521861

GRIPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Cislo, Esq.

DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP1333 2ND STREETSUITE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Wigs and hairpieces for persons who have little to no hair typically resulting from a medical hair loss condition sold in high end salonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 8, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 24, 2013RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 24, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 13, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 13, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 10, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2012AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 24, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 23, 2012EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2012AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance