Drawing for BONFIRE WINGS GENUINE CREOLE, UNIQUELY CAJUN!

USPTO serial 85521900

BONFIRE WINGS GENUINE CREOLE, UNIQUELY CAJUN!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONFIRE WINGS GENUINE CREOLE, UNIQUELY CAJUN!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Cain

JOHN C CAIN WONG CABELLO LUTSCH RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, LLP20333 SH 249SUITE 600HOUSTON, TX 77070

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Bar services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premisesACTIVEDec 21, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 3, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 18, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 18, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 22, 2013RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 16, 2013GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2013GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 7, 2013RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jun 7, 2013RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2013RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jun 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 28, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 26, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2012GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2012GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2012NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance