USPTO serial 85522548
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Coppell, TX
Coppell, TX
STMICROELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL N.V.
GENEVA, CH
Other trademarks owned by STMICROELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL N.V.
Coppell, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
Molly Buck Richard RICHARD LAW GROUP5910 N. Central ExpresswaySUITE 325DALLAS, TX 75206| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductors, integrated circuits, electronic circuits, microprocessors, and microcontrollers; software for video processing, enhancement and format conversion; software for navigation; operating system software; software for accessing and controlling data on and communications with smart cards; security software, namely, software for encryption, authentication, and identification; software drivers; compiler software, computer software development tools, software development kits primarily comprised of computer software development tools and also containing application programming interfaces (APIs) for developing other computer software, software optimization tools, namely, computer software development tools, software translation tools, namely, computer software for translating computer code, software that enables building, operating and programming networked computer systems; computer firmware and software for use in the operation of semiconductors and integrated circuits; computer firmware and software for use in the operation of semiconductors and integrated circuits; amplifiers; camera modules; comparators; diodes; circuit boards; integrated circuits, namely, electromagnetic interference filters, signal conditioners, thyristors, digital and analog filter chips, battery management chips, RFID chips, electrically erasable programmable read only memory, also known as EEPROM, micro-electromechanical systems, also known as MEMS, the foregoing comprising integrated circuits; electronic memories; signal processors; voltage converters, controllers, and regulators; current converters, controllers, limiters, and regulators; power converters, controllers, and regulators; surge suppressors; accelerometers; proximity sensors; image sensors; temperature sensors; pressure sensors; gyroscopes; electronic switches; transistors; multiplexers; photovoltaic cells; and application specific integrated circuits for aerospace, audio, automotive, biometric, broadcasting, cellular phone, communication, computer, consumer, displays, DVD, entertainment, global positioning, hard disk, imaging, LCD, liquid crystal display, lighting, mobility, motor control, networking, power, security, smart card, solar, storage, television, touch-screen, wireless, and video applications | ACTIVE | Feb 14, 2012 |
| 040 | [ Custom manufacture of semiconductors and integrated circuits; manufacturing electric and electronic components for others ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 2012 |
| 042 | Engineering services; design of semiconductors and integrated circuits for others; software and firmware design and development for others; engineering services in the field of semiconductors and integrated circuits | ACTIVE | Feb 14, 2012 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 18, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 31, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 31, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 23, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |