Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85522620?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85522620. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85522620, the listed owner(s) include: MModal IP LLC, MModal IP LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 85522620?

Serial number 85522620 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE?

M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE (85522620) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE?

The public record lists International Classes: 009, 035, 041, 042. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85522620

M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jan 23, 2012
Status date: Dec 12, 2016
Registration date: —
Examiner: SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

MModal IP LLC
Franklin, TN
Other trademarks owned by MModal IP LLC
MModal IP LLC
Franklin, TN
Other trademarks owned by MModal IP LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bassam N. Ibrahim

BASSAM N. IBRAHIM BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY, PC1737 King Street, Suite 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Computer software for natural language, speech, speaker, voice and/or voice-print recognition, identification, verification and/or processing for use in the fields of transcription, healthcare documentation, healthcare records management; computer software development tools; computer software and computer software development tools for speech and language recognition; computer software for natural language, speech, speaker, voice and/or voice-print recognition, identification, verification and/or processing for use in the fields of medical records, medical coding, compliance and health information management	ACTIVE	—
035	Medical transcription services; medical coding services	ACTIVE	—
041	Educational services, namely, training in the use of computer software for voice recognition and medical records	ACTIVE	—
042	Computer software consultation; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; and computer software design	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 27, 2019	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Dec 12, 2016	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2016	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2016	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
May 5, 2016	EX5G	SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED	—
May 3, 2016	EXT5	SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED	—
May 3, 2016	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2016	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Nov 11, 2015	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Nov 10, 2015	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
Nov 5, 2015	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
Nov 5, 2015	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2015	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
May 12, 2015	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
May 12, 2015	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
May 5, 2015	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
May 5, 2015	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2014	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Dec 4, 2014	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Dec 3, 2014	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Nov 3, 2014	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Nov 3, 2014	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2014	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Aug 6, 2014	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
May 6, 2014	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
May 2, 2014	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
May 2, 2014	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
May 2, 2014	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2013	NOAM	NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2013	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Sep 10, 2013	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2013	NONP	NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	—
Aug 2, 2013	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Aug 1, 2013	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jul 30, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 30, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 30, 2013	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jan 31, 2013	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jan 31, 2013	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2013	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 4, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 4, 2013	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2012	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Nov 7, 2012	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
Aug 29, 2012	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Jul 5, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 15, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 8, 2012	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 29, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2012	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 27, 2012	MDSC	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Jan 26, 2012	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Jan 26, 2012	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—