USPTO serial 85522763
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patchen M. Haggerty
CHARLENE M KROGH DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1400 WEWATTA STREETSUITE 400DENVER, CO 80202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely, composite panels composed primarily of an expanded polystyrene core encased in a steel lining | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |