USPTO serial 85523011
THE L.A. COMPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE L.A. COMPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan L. Heller
Susan L. Heller GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900Los Angeles, CA 90067-2121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing internet chartrooms via an Internet website; Providing on-line forum for discussion of television programs via a website | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of ongoing drama television programs broadcast over television and the Internet; Providing an Internet website featuring entertainment in the nature of online electronic games; Providing an Internet website for conducting contests, an online fan club, and information regarding television shows, made-for-TV movies, actors, and online news stories, and for providing non-downloadable playback of music and video content via global communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |