Drawing for TAKEDA

USPTO serial 85523088

TAKEDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IMAM, AMEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TAKEDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bin Li

BIN LI LAW OFFICES OF BIN LI AND ASSOCIATES17800 CASTLETON ST #605CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Massage chairs, massage apparatus and instruments, electric massage appliances, namely, electric vibrating massagers, electric massage sticks, and electric foot massagersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 2, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance