Drawing for SLATE TO SCREEN

USPTO serial 85523334

SLATE TO SCREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLATE TO SCREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth Berke

KENNETH BERKE BERKE & KENT LLP23901 CALABASAS RD STE 2068CALABASAS, CA 91302-3303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Movie editing projectorsACTIVE—
012Computer laptop mount specially adapted for use in vehicles; Land vehicle parts in the nature of wire harnesses, namely, wires, terminals and connectors bundled together to transmit electric power and signals to electric or electronic equipment mounted on the body parts of automobiles; Land vehicles, namely, trucks for housing movie viewing and editing equipment; Motor vehicles, namely, automobiles, trucks, vans, sport utility vehicles and structural parts thereforACTIVE—
039Leasing of motor vehicles; Leasing of vehicles; Motor vehicle sharing services, namely, providing temporary use of motor vehicles; Rental of motor vehicles; Rental of vehicles; Vehicle rentalACTIVE—
045Consulting in the field of intellectual property licensing; Stock photography services, namely, leasing reproduction rights of photographs, transparencies and digital content to othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance