USPTO serial 85523667
BOOYAH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOOYAH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thayer M. Preece
THAYER M. PREECE SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP379 LYTTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1479UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software, video game software; downloadable video game software; video game software for use on mobile telephones, smartphones, pagers, mobile and handheld computers, PDAs, and other mobile and handheld communications devices; downloadable video game software for use on mobile telephones, smartphones, pagers, mobile and handheld computers, PDAs, and other mobile and handheld communications devices; computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile and internet applications and client interfaces; telecommunications and social networking computer software for use in connection with online social games and for transporting and aggregating voice, data and video communication across global computer networks; computer software for use on computers and mobile devices for creating virtual communities and for creating and interacting with other metagame players via digital personas and avatars; computer software for use on computers and mobile devices to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information regarding the fields of virtual communities, electronic gaming, entertainment, and general interest via the Internet or other communications networks with third parties; downloadable virtual goods, namely, clothing, accessories, land, buildings, objects, tools, characters, and currency for use in online virtual worlds | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2011 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games via the internet or wireless communications networks; entertainment services, namely, providing online, non-downloadable virtual clothing, accessories, land, buildings, objects, tools, characters, and currency, for use in virtual environments created for entertainment purposes; providing an internet website portal in the field of computer games and gaming; providing information online relating to computer games and computer enhancements for games; entertainment services, namely, providing virtual environments in which users can interact through social games for recreational, leisure, or entertainment purposes; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable audio, video and graphics to mobile communications devices via wireless networks and a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring user-defined content regarding games, gaming, social networking, and virtual communities; providing an online magazine in the fields of mobile and wireless communications, wireless communications software, social networking, creating digital personas and avatars, mobile and online communication methods and services, video games, software, and online games; providing recognition and incentive awards whereby participants in augmented reality and social gaming can earn virtual rewards for demonstrating extraordinary skill or excellence regarding user-defined goals and group-defined goals | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2011 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, competitions, and individual and group challenges, showcase and improve their skills, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software tools for use in accessing, playing, and tracking performance of computer games; application service provider featuring software for use in creating social networking web sites and developing video games, and to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information via the Internet and wireless communications networks | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2011 |
| 045 | Online social networking services; providing on-line computer databases and on-line searchable databases in the field of social networking | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Booyah Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Booyah Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BOOYAH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |