Drawing for HOLY COW! IT'S PEANUT MILK

USPTO serial 85523947

HOLY COW! IT'S PEANUT MILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLY COW! IT'S PEANUT MILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. Michael Sajovec

F. MICHAEL SAJOVEC MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVEC PA4140 PARKLAKE AVE STE 600RALEIGH, NC 27612-3730UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Peanut based food beverages that are not fortified with protein besides that naturally occurring in peanutsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2014ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2014CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 10, 2014EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2013GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 8, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance