USPTO serial 85524794
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D. PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Verifying the credentials of psychology professionals to facilitate the granting of a license to practice in a second or subsequent jurisdiction | ACTIVE | Sep 19, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |