Drawing for HARVEST OS

USPTO serial 85525207

HARVEST OS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARVEST OS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence D. Graham

LAWRENCE D. GRAHAM LOWE GRAHAM JONES PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104-7009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Planting soil; Potting soil; Garden planting soil; Flower and vegetable soil mix containing planting soils, soil amendments, soil conditioning preparations, soil conditioners; Plant food; All-purpose plant food; All natural plant food; Acid plant food; Flower bloom booster, namely, soil additives, soil improving preparations, soil conditioners; Growing media for plants; Propagation media, namely, soil-less mixtures containing peat moss, vermiculite, perlite, compost, fertilizers; Container mix, namely, soil-less mixtures containing peat moss, vermiculite, perlite, compost, fertilizers; Agricultural lime; Gypsum for use as a fertilizer; Compost; all the aforementioned goods being organic in natureACTIVE—
004Natural gas; Fuel gas; Biofuel, namely, biogas; Compressed natural gas; Processed engineered fuel; all the aforementioned goods being organic in natureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 23, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 16, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance