Drawing for KURLY KERATIN

USPTO serial 85525232

KURLY KERATIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KURLY KERATIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger H Bora

ROGER H BORA THOMPSON HINE LLP10050 INNOVATION DR STE 400MIAMISBURG, OH 45342-4934UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 24, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 24, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 8, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 18, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 21, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 13, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 13, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 13, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 13, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 19, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 12, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance