USPTO serial 85525785
IKO ENERFOIL MT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IKO ENERFOIL MT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry L. Saret
LARRY L. SARET MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP180 N STETSON AVE STE 2000CHICAGO, IL 60601-6807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | membrane tape for insulation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |