Drawing for CLUTTER CLEANER

USPTO serial 85526220

CLUTTER CLEANER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLUTTER CLEANER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dominic P. Madigan

DOMINIC P. MADIGAN MCCANDLISH HOLTON, PC1111 E MAIN STSuite 2100RICHMOND, VA 23219-3521

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003All-purpose cleaners; Carpet cleaners; Cleaning agents and preparations; Cleaning agents for cleaning surfaces; Glass cleaners; Natural soap bars; Soaps for household useACTIVE—
005Air deodorizing preparations; Disinfectant bathroom cleanersACTIVE—
016General purpose plastic bags; Plastic trash bags; Trash bagsACTIVE—
020Storage and organization systems comprising shelves, drawers, cupboards, baskets and clothes rods, sold as a unit; Storage racksACTIVE—
021Brooms; Cleaning brushes for household use; Cleaning rags; Collapsible storage containers for domestic use; Dusting brushes; Floor brushes; General purpose storage bins for household use; Mops; Plastic storage containers for domestic use; Scrubbing brushes; Trash cansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 10, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 23, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 20, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 9, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 6, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2012CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 8, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 8, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance