Drawing for ACCELERA MOBILE BROADBAND

USPTO serial 85526476

ACCELERA MOBILE BROADBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCELERA MOBILE BROADBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hillary I. Schroeder

Hillary I. Schroeder Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati650 Page Mill RoadPalo Alto, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for managing wireless networks and mobile broadband networksACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing wireless networks and mobile broadband networks; providing access to non-downloadable software for managing wireless networks and mobile broadband networks; consulting services in the field of managing wireless networks and mobile broadband networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 22, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 20, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 9, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance