Drawing for LA

USPTO serial 85526552

LA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew Bilinsky

MATTHEW BILINSKY WEINBERG GONSER LLP1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 520LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2307UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniformsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2012MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance