Drawing for REDBOX INSTANT

USPTO serial 85526613

REDBOX INSTANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDBOX INSTANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heidi L. Sachs

HEIDI L. SACHS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, messages and information by means of communications networks; Internet broadcasting services; video streaming services via the Internet featuring films and movies; distribution of entertainment content, namely, distribution services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; video-on-demand transmission services; streaming of audio, visual, and audiovisual material via the internet; video-on-demand transmission services, video broadcasting, transmission of voice, data, images, data signals, messages and information by electronic communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 11, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance