USPTO serial 85527778
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane L. Gardner
DIANE L GARDNER MASTERMIND IP LAW PC421 SANTA MARINA COURTESCONDIDO, CA 92029-7915UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Health, wellness, productivity and lifestyle management and health risk reduction services provided to hospitals, health insurers, benefits consultants, insurance brokers, businesses, business purchase consortiums, and organizations responsible for the health care of others, namely, health assessment services, clinical screening assessment services, biometric data analysis and reporting for healthcare purposes, and wellness and health-related consultation services in the nature of creation of personalized health profiles, namely, setting health, wellness, productivity and lifestyle goals, providing information on maintaining health and wellness, providing personalized health reporting and metrics services for healthcare purposes, providing client health, wellness, productivity, and lifestyle progress tracking services, and healthcare management services designed to encourage client participation in health and wellness promoting activities | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 6, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |