USPTO serial 85528672
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph E. Oliver
JOSEPH E. OLIVER JOSEPH E. OLIVER, CO.230 WHITE POND DRAKRON, OH 44313-7239UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Compression socks for medical or therapeutic use; medical compression stockings and tights; medical hosiery, namely, compression sleeves, socks and hosiery | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 2012 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |