Drawing for DR. MOO MOO

USPTO serial 85528877

DR. MOO MOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. MOO MOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRYAN P. STANLEY

BRYAN P. STANLEY KUTAK ROCK LLP2300 MAIN STREETSUITE 800KANSAS CITY, MO 64108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026hair barrettes, hair bands, shoe ornaments not of precious metal, hat ornaments not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 9, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 9, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 8, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2012MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 2, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance