USPTO serial 85530107
MODIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Johnson Walden
Cynthia Johnson Walden Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a web-based service featuring technology that enables users to customize computer providing a web-based service featuring technology that enables users to customize computer software; customization of computer software; online non-downloadable software for modifying and customizing pre-existing computer software and Internet content; online non-downloadable software for use in developing and executing other computer programs on computers, computer networks, and global communications networks; online non-downloadable software computer programs for use in navigating, browsing, transferring information, and distributing and viewing other computer programs on computers, computer networks and global communications networks; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to create, modify and personalize pre-existing computer software; application service provider (ASP) featuring software to create, modify and personalize pre-existing computer software; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software; business technology software consultation services; consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable software and applications; design and implementation of software and technology solutions for the purpose of product and document authentication and tracking, and brand monitoring and protection, to protect against counterfeiting, tampering, and diversion, and to ensure the integrity of genuine products and documents; developing and managing application software for delivery of multi-media content for use on wireless mobile devices; developing and managing application software and databases for delivery of multi-media content provided by museums and other tour venues for use on multiple types of wireless mobile devices; development and implementation of software, hardware and technology solutions for the purpose of productization of electronic components and electronic systems; development and implementation of software, hardware and technology solutions for the purpose of testing of electronic components and electronic systems; development of computer programs recorded on data media (software) designed for use in construction and automated manufacturing (cad/cam); inserting software protection programs and security programs onto magnetic media; providing an Internet website portal in the fields of technology and software development; providing computer programming services to customers that enables them to provide video and audio content on their web sites; providing information in the fields of technology and software development via an on-line website; recording data for others on optical, digital and magnetic media for electronic storage; technology specification, namely, analyzing technology requirements and developing recommendations for the computer software and systems and other technology needed to meet those requirements, in the fields of web and mobile applications, social media, social networking, online and mobile games, and marketing and advertising; all of the foregoing not related to human resource services, project management or staffing services and solutions for information technology and professional services in general | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |