Drawing for ASCEND

USPTO serial 85530946

ASCEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASCEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy L. Brosius, VP and Associate General Counsel - Intellectual Property

Amy L. Brosius, VP and Associate General Counsel - GREEN MOUNTAIN COFFEE ROASTERS, INC.33 COFFEE LNWATERBURY, VT 05676-8900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CoffeeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 13, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 7, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 4, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance