Drawing for STORAGE WARS

USPTO serial 85531425

STORAGE WARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STORAGE WARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman Dentons US LLPWACKER DR. STATION, 233 SOUTH WACKER DR.P.O. BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household and kitchen containers; china, namely, ornaments, decorative centerpieces, figures, plaques, and sculptures; earthenware for tabletops, namely, serving platters, jars, plaques, figures and decorative centerpieces; dishes, bowls, plates, figurines of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, porcelain, terra cotta, plastic and stained glassACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, pants, skirts, dresses, shorts, blouses, sweaters, sweat jackets, sweat pants, sweat suits, sweat shorts, swim wear, socks, gloves, scarves, under garments and outer jackets; headwear, footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 22, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 19, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2012GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2012GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2012EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
May 16, 2012CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance