USPTO serial 85535321
ACTERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4865154Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2015
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACTERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence H. Binderow
LAWRENCE H. BINDEROW BINDEROW LAW OFFICES1330 CAMINO DEL MAR STE 250DEL MAR, CA 92014-2508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY IMMUNO-CHEMICAL AND NANOTECHNOLOGY AND/OR CHEMICAL FOOD SAFETY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTIC TEST KITS COMPRISING TEST CASSETTES IN THE NATURE OF TESTING ASSAYS, ENRICHMENT MEDIA IN THE NATURE OF CULTURE MEDIA, AND A COMPACT DESKTOP-BASED DIAGNOSTIC READING DEVICE THAT REPORTS THE TEST RESULTS FROM THE DISPOSABLE ASSAY CASSETTES LOADED WITH FOOD SAMPLES THAT HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY ENRICHED FOR BACTERIAL GROWTH, FOR USE IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DIAGNOSTICS FOR DETECTING PATHOGENS IN THE HUMAN FOOD CHAIN; ENRICHMENT BROTH MEDIA IN THE NATURE OF CULTURE MEDIA FOR USE IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH TESTING AND DIAGNOSTIC TESTING FOR DETECTING PATHOGENS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | LABORATORY AND ON-SITE DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES FOR USE IN DETECTING PATHOGENS, NAMELY, LATERAL FLOW MAGNETIC IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC TEST CASSETTES AND DIAGNOSTIC MAGNETIC IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC TEST READERS FOR USE IN READING TEST RESULTS FOR DETECTING PATHOGENS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FoodChek Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FoodChek Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FoodChek Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ACTERO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |