Drawing for THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF CLEAN

USPTO serial 85536013

THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Nagle, Jr.

DAVID W. NAGLE, JR. STITES & HARBISON, PLLC400 W MARKET ST STE 1800LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3352UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pneumatic transporters; bulk handling and conveying equipment, namely, conveyors for handling bulk equipment in the nature of steel, stainless steel and aluminum silos; machinery, namely, vacuum distillation equipment; conveying system equipment, namely, blowers; vacuum filters, namely, pressure receivers; bulk material handling machines, namely, discharging membrane hoppers; cyclone material separators; pump control valves; valves for pumps; valves being parts of machines in the nature of screw feeders and ribbon blenders; machinery, namely, bulk material compacting machines; couplings for machines; bulk front end bag loaders and unloaders; rotary valves being parts of machines; bin vent filters being parts of machines; lime slakers, namely machines for producing hydrated lime having a classifying tank and an impeller mixer; conveyors; pneumatic transfer equipment for bulk materials, namely, dischargers, receivers, blowersACTIVE—
037Installation and maintenance of equipment for the conveyance, storage and handling of bulk materials and chemicals; installation and maintenance of bulk material storage silos and conveyors; installation of liquid storage reservoirs for municipal and industrial use; installation and maintenance of flue gas desulphurization systemsACTIVE—
042Design and engineering of bulk material handling systems; design of bulk material storage silos and conveyors; design of liquid storage reservoirs for municipal and industrial use; design of flue gas desulphurization systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 8, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 8, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 7, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance