USPTO serial 85536033
KENACTIV INNOVATIONS INC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KENACTIV INNOVATIONS INC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Drilling fluid lost circulation material in the form of drilling mud additives for use in oil well drilling, partially composed of chemical additives and natural plant fibers made from the kenaf plant, and drilling mud additives derived from organic, biodegradable natural fibers made from the kenaf plant for efficiency optimization and risk mitigation in on- and offshore drilling for hydrocarbon production and exploration; nontoxic, biodegradable powder for use in liquid spill remediation for absorbing oil, fuel, hydraulic fluid, solvents and other liquids in industrial, commercial, residential and natural environments including open water; organic, biodegradable fertilizers, soil amendments and soil improving agents and soil additives made from natural fibers; charcoal for use as a soil conditioner | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Raw, processed and treated naturally-derived plant fibers made from the kenaf plant for use as textile in the manufacturing of clothing, textiles, furniture, padding, filters, automotive interior panels and upholstery, normally made with cotton fibers, wool fibers, wood and other natural fibers, synthetic fibers or glass fibers; organic, biodegradable natural plant fibers for use as a textile made from the kenaf plant for use in manufacturing in the fiberglass, plastics, automotive, paper, packaging, flooring, and textiles industries; organic, biodegradable natural plant fibers for use as a textile made from the kenaf plant for use in manufacturing in the clothing industry, for the use in the manufacture of commercial and home textiles, in the coated milling industry, in the manufacture of nonwovens for use in the personal and consumer products industries; fiber-like particles of cellulose or short plant fibers of cellulose derived from the kenaf plant, for use as a textile in manufacturing in the furniture, carpeting and floor covering, vehicle, footwear and clothing industries; organic, biodegradable spun natural plant fibers for use as a textile made from the kenaf plant for use in manufacturing clothing and clothing accessories, footwear, and for manufacturing commercial and home textiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Organic, biodegradable mulch made from natural fibers for hydroseeding and hydromulching in residential and commercial landscaping, public works, highway and road development projects, forest fire remediation and erosion control as well as for use in landscape mulching and hydroseeding for golf courses; mulch for general landscaping use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BioTech Mills, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KENACTIV INNOVATIONS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named KENACTIV INNOVATIONS INC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |