Drawing for OSMOLATOR

USPTO serial 85536636

OSMOLATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OSMOLATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karlyn A. Schnapp

KARLYN A. SCHNAPP FROST BROWN TODD LLC3300 GREAT AMERICAN TOWER 301 E 4TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Accessories for aquaria, in particular aquarium filtration devices, lighting for aquaria, heating appliances; water treatment devices, namely, filtration units, reverse osmosis units, foam removing units, units for providing a flow of gas bubbles, especially air and oxygen bubbles in waterACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 20, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 20, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 25, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 2, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 31, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 31, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 16, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 11, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance