Drawing for CHILDSAFE

USPTO serial 85537487

CHILDSAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHILDSAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric Karich

ERIC KARICH KARICH & ASSOCIATES2061 BUSINESS CENTER DR STE 214IRVINE, CA 92612-1108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software system for tracking people, objects and pets using GPS data from a device on the tracked people, objects and petsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2012MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance