USPTO serial 85539562
KALTITUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ARANT, LUCY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KALTITUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Blainville, Québec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Multi-Vitamin Preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |