USPTO serial 85540708
UNCLE GIUSEPPE'S M A R K E T P L A C E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNCLE GIUSEPPE'S M A R K E T P L A C E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmingdale, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ready-made sauces | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |