Drawing for UNWIND

USPTO serial 85542483

UNWIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNWIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles J. Raubicheck

CHARLES J RAUBICHECK FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 28, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 21, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 17, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 17, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 17, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance