USPTO serial 85546326
WHITEBIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHITEBIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bicycles; structural parts therefor; Parts for bicycles, namely, derailleurs, driving and control means for change-speed gears, front changers, cable guides, cables, sheathers, knobs, control levers, toe clips, toe straps, pedal cleats, saddle covers, saddle bags, cargo carriers, luggage carriers, canteen racks, mud guards, chain guards, bells, stop stands, mirrors, tire patches, bicycle holders for vehicles, bags adapted for bicycles, baskets adapted for bicycles, handlebar grip covers, bicycle trailers, wheel covers, shock absorbers, direction indicators; Automobile structural parts; Automobile parts, namely, wheels, brake calipers, brake drums, brake master cylinders, steering knuckles, suspension control arms, suspension springs, suspension struts, suspension stabilizer bars, steering columns, windshield wiper assemblies, namely, windshield wiper blade supports and windshield wiper blades, windshield washer solvent reservoirs, fuel tanks, bumpers, exterior trim in the nature of metal and plastic extruded decorative and protective trim, windshields, windows, horns, rear view mirrors, air bags, accelerator pedal assemblies, interior air conditioning distribution ducts sold as separate structural parts of automobiles, mud flap brackets as structural parts of vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | T-shirts; Athletic clothing, namely, headwear, neckwear, coats, jackets, shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, blouses, singlets, robes, swimwear, underwear, belts, pants, shorts, jeans, skirts, gloves, hosiery, footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |