Drawing for COLOR REFLECTION

USPTO serial 85549835

COLOR REFLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR REFLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel I. Schloss

DANIEL I. SCHLOSS GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 Park AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024bedspreads, bed sheets, pillow cases, bed blankets, comforters, quilts, towels, textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors, curtains, fabric window treatments and covers, namely, curtains and draperiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 3, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 1, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Apr 30, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 30, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 7, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 29, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance