USPTO serial 85550904
PHYSICAL APPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHYSICAL APPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Walker
ELIZABETH A WALKER CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLPTWO INTERNATIONAL PLACEBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video game software for mobile devices, digital media players, smartphones and tablets; downloadable electronic game programs; downloadable computer game software; interactive game software; computer application software for mobile devices, digital media players, smartphones and tablets for providing exercise and physical fitness instruction, routines, techniques, and programs, and for use in playing games in the fields of sports, education, exercise, physical therapy or rehabilitation | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | body rehabilitation apparatus for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | balls for games, sports, educational activities, and exercise; foam game balls for encasing mobile devices, digital media players, smartphones, and tablets; game equipment for use with interactive game software, namely, balls, bats, rackets, darts and discs for encasing mobile devices, digital media players, smartphones, and tablets; bath toys; bendable toys; disc toss toys; toy blocks; toys for encasing mobile devices, digital media players, smartphones, and tablets, for use with interactive game software and computer software applications; exercise equipment, namely, kettle bells, weight-training apparatus, weight-lifting apparatus; body-training apparatus for physical exercises | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; cloud computing featuring computer game software; cloud computing featuring interactive game software; cloud computing featuring computer application software for mobile devices, digital media players, smartphones and tablets for providing exercise and physical fitness instruction, routines, techniques, and programs, and for playing games in the fields of sports, education, exercise, physical therapy or rehabilitation; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting computer software games for others; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting interactive game software; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting computer application software for mobile devices, digital media players, smartphones and tablets for providing exercise and physical fitness instruction, routines, techniques, and programs, and for playing games in the fields of sports, education, exercise, physical therapy or rehabilitation; hosting an online community web site allowing users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, engage in social networking, participate in multi-player gaming sessions, participate in application developer communities, and participate in FAQ groups and forums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Physical Apps, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Physical Apps, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PHYSICAL APPS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |