USPTO serial 85550977
ORGANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORGANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Schiltach, DE
SCHILTACH, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nirav D. Parikh
NIRAV D. PARIKH MASCO CORPORATION21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180-1300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | APPARATUS FOR WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY PURPOSES, NAMELY, MIXING VALVES BEING PARTS FOR SANITARY INSTALLATIONS, MANUALLY OR AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLABLE FITTINGS FOR WATER INLETS AND OUTLETS, NAMELY, FAUCETS, TUB CONTROL VALVES, SPOUTS, TRAPS; TAPS FOR WASHSTANDS, BIDETS AND SINKS, TAPS FOR TUBS AND SHOWERS; SANITARY TUBS AND BASINS, BATH TUBS, SHOWER TRAYS, WHIRLPOOL TUBS, BIDETS; HOUSINGS AND LININGS, MAINLY NOT OF METAL, BEING PARTS FOR SHOWER CUBICLES; SHOWERS AND SHOWER CUBICLES; SHOWERS AND SHOWER FITTINGS, NAMELY, SHOWER HEADS, SHOWER HEAD SPRAYERS, SHOWER COMBINATIONS, NAMELY, SHOWER HEADS, LATERAL-JET SHOWERS, HAND-HELD SHOWER HEADS, FLEXIBLE PIPES BEING PARTS OF SHOWER INSTALLATIONS, OVERHEAD HEADS, LATERAL-JET SHOWERS, HAND-HELD SHOWERS, SANITARY FLEXIBLE TUBES, SPRAY NOZZLES, THE FOREGOING BEING PARTS OF SANITARY INSTALLATIONS; SHOWER HOLDERS; PRE-ASSEMBLED MULTIFUNCTION SHOWERS; INTAKE AND OUTLET FITTINGS FOR SANITARY BASINS, WASHSTANDS, SINKS, BIDETS, BATH TUBS AND SHOWER TRAYS; SIPHONS IN THE NATURE OF WATER INLET AND OUTLET PIPES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |