USPTO serial 85551069
WATER QUALITY BY MATRIKX THE SCIENCE BEHIND BETTER WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WATER QUALITY BY MATRIKX THE SCIENCE BEHIND BETTER WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Curcio
Robert Curcio DELIO & PETERSON, LLC700 State Street, Suite 402New Haven, CT 06511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL AND MINERAL FIBER PULP TREATMENT PREPARATIONS IN THE NATURE OF FILTERING MATERIALS FOR THE MANUFACTURING OF CONSUMER AIR AND WATERS FILTERS AND FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF COMMERCIAL AND FOOD SERVICE ACTIVATED CARBON FILTERS; CERAMIC PARTICLES FOR USE AS FILTER MEDIA FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL USE IN THE PURIFICATION OF AIR AND DRINKING WATER, AND FOR THE GENERAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE IN THE PURIFICATION OF AIR AND INDUSTRIAL FLUIDS | ACTIVE | Feb 29, 2012 |
| 011 | WATER AND AIR FILTERS FOR DOMESTIC, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE; WATER FILTERING UNITS FOR PRODUCING POTABLE WATER FOR DOMESTIC USE; COMPONENTS OF WATER FILTRATION UNITS FOR PRODUCING POTABLE WATER FOR DOMESTIC USE, NAMELY, ACTIVATED CARBON WATER FILTERS; FILTER SYSTEMS PRIMARILY COMPRISED OF WATER FILTERING UNITS, AIR FILTERING UNITS, AND FILTERS FOR DRINKING WATER; FIBROUS FILTER MEDIA FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL USE IN THE PURIFICATION OF AIR AND DRINKING WATER, AND FOR THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE IN THE PURIFICATION OF AIR AND INDUSTRIAL FLUIDS; AIR AND WATER FILTER SYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR DOMESTIC, INDUSTRIAL, AND COMMERCIAL USE, NAMELY, FILTER HOUSINGS; FILTERS MADE OF FIBER FOR WATER FILTRATION, NAMELY, CARBON FIBER AND CELLULOSE-BASED FIBER; FILTERS FOR WATER PURIFICATION APPARATUS, REVERSE-OSMOSIS SYSTEMS, NAMELY, REVERSE-OSMOSIS FILTRATION UNITS, AND DISTILLING UNITS FOR DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL USE; DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS, NAMELY, UNDER SINK WATER FILTRATION UNITS, CARTRIDGE FILTRATION UNITS, PORTABLE WATER DISPENSERS, namely, PITCHERS, WITH FILTRATION UNITS SOLD SEPARATELY; WATER FILTRATION UNITS SOLD AS A COMPONENT PART OF PORTABLE PITCHERS AND BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY | ACTIVE | Feb 29, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KX Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KX Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named WATER QUALITY BY MATRIKX THE SCIENCE BEHIND BETTER WATER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |