USPTO serial 85552124
OPIELA DERMO REDENSIFYING CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPIELA DERMO REDENSIFYING CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boucherville (Québec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S. EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Therapeutic socks and gloves for skin care purpose | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |