Drawing for ACCURACY MATTERS

USPTO serial 85553811

ACCURACY MATTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCURACY MATTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Bilinski, Esq.

Peter J. Bilinski HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLPOne Park Place, 300 South State StreetSYRACUSE, NY 13212-3541UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007industrial shock absorbers for machines, namely, impact dampersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2014UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance