USPTO serial 85554194
INSTANTIS ENTERPRISESTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTANTIS ENTERPRISESTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Hughes
John A. Hughes KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for project management, task management and scheduling; computer software enabling communications between computer users relating to project management, task management and scheduling; computer software to enable social networking and collaboration; communications software for connecting computer users; computer software for database management; computer software for organizing meetings, tasks, agendas, topics, discussion groups, and expertise and for sharing information and status updates; computer software for delivering updates and notifications from projects, portfolios, ideas, proposals, strategies, resources, financials, business metrics, dashboards, reports to browsers, mobile phones and third-party social software; computer software to receive updates from third-party software and deliver such updates to users; feature of computer software for enabling communications between computer users; feature of computer software for project management and scheduling; feature of computer software to enable social networking and collaboration; feature of computer software for connecting computer users; feature of computer software for sharing information and status updates; feature of computer software for delivering updates and notifications from projects, portfolios, ideas, proposals, strategies, resources, financials, business metrics, dashboards, reports to browsers, mobile phones and third-party social software; feature of computer software for receiving updates from third-party software and delivering such updates to users | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for project management, task management, and scheduling; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software enabling communications between computer users relating to project management, task management and scheduling; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software to enable social networking and collaboration; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring communications software for connecting computer users; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for database management; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for organizing meetings, tasks, agendas, topics, discussion groups, and expertise and for sharing information and status updates; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for delivering updates and notifications from projects, portfolios, ideas, proposals, strategies, resources, financials, business metrics, dashboards, reports to browsers, mobile phones and third-party social software; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software to receive updates from third-party software and deliver such updates to users; computer consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |