USPTO serial 85554445
ALL-WAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALL-WAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dara L. Onofrio, Esq
DARA L ONOFRIO ONOFRIO LAW24 WEST MAIN STREETSUITE 329CLINTON, CT 06413Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Air freight shipping services; Airline and shipping services; Freight forwarding services; Freight loading services; Global transportation of freight for others by all available means; Supply chain logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of documents, packages, raw materials, and other freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck; Warehousing services, namely, storage, distribution, pick-up, packing, and shipping of gourmet food and spirits, fresh fruits and vegetables, garments, textiles and other general merchandise | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 18, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |