USPTO serial 85555099
FIXMO APPZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIXMO APPZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Stone Levy
JESSICA STONE LEVY LAW OFFICE OF JESSICA STONE LEVY, PLLC4950 S YOSEMITE ST # F2-341GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111-1349UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and downloadable computer software to ensure the integrity, compliance, auditability, governance as well as detection of unauthorized access into and of networks and mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |